13 Ekim 2012 Cumartesi

The Art of Fashion in Television: FIDM's Annual Gala

To contact us Click HERE
FIDMCostumeGala
Downton Abbey
Saturday, July 28th Emmy-nominated designers from such primetime hits as American Horror Story, Downton Abbey and Boardwalk Empire came together to celebrate and talk costumes at the 6th Annual Outstanding Art in Television Costume Design gala.
The night kicked off with a preview of the costumes at the FIDM Museum & Galleries in DTLA.  Having never been to the FIDM Museum, I was more than excited to find a substantial array of amazing designs with no plexiglass in between. Love this night already.  


Here are a few of my favorite displays...
FIDMCostumeGala
Magic City
FIDMCostumeGala
American Horror Story
FIDMCostumeGala
Pretty Little Liars

Venturing outside, we were met with the beautiful landscape of Grand Hope Park, not to mention a plethora of treats, drinks and mingle-worthy guests from the television and fashion industries.

FIDMCostumeGala
(top left) The awards stage, (top right) Super fashionable FIDM Gala staff member,
(bottom) Madison-To-Melrose blogger, Olivia & I enjoying the scenery.

Ruth Myers (Hemingway & Gellhorn), Eduardo Castro (Once Upon A Time) and Chrisi Karvonides (American Horror Story) were honored by Television Academy Chairman/CEO, Bruce Rosenblum for their outstanding craftsmanship.  They and FIDM Museum guest curator/costume designer, Mary Rose are pictured below.
FIDMCostumeGala

The Outstanding Art in Television Costume Design exhibit at the FIDM Museum is FREE & now open to the public until October 28, 2012.  Visit Tuesday-Saturday, 10am-5pm and be sure to see who wins it all at this year's Emmy Awards Sept. 23, 2012.  GO! It is more than worth the trip.

Xo,Melissa 

L.A. Loves Alex's Lemonade September 29 Food Event

To contact us Click HERE
Culver studios backdrop
Chefs Suzanne Goin and David Lentz, along with Suzanne's business partner Caroline Styne, for the third year are assembling some of the best celebrity chefs and mixologists from Los Angeles, San Francisco, New Orleans, Miami, Chicago, Seattle, Cleveland, Philadelphia, and New York City to raise funds for pediatric cancer research on behalf of Alex's Lemonade Stand Foundation (ALSF).  L.A. Loves Alex's Lemonade event on Saturday, September 29, 2012 at the Culver Studios from noon to 4 pm will again be among the best food events occurring  in Los Angeles.  A general admission ticket is $175 with a significant portion ($100) of that amount tax deductible.  The story of the creation of ALSF by Liz and Jay Scott is heartbreaking, as they watched in amazement how their very young daughter Alex raised over a million dollars to find a cure for pediatric cancer, such that they captured her passion by creating ALSF after her passing.  Having the opportunity to talk with Liz and Jay in 2010 was a cherished moment, and I was fighting back tears.

Just like Suzanne, David, and Caroline masterminded this Los Angeles foodie event, my late wife Karen Gibbs and I also became enchanted with the mission of ALSF and we volunteered four shifts (working all day and into the night doing cleanup) during the initial 2010 event in which over $300,000 was raised.  Unfortunately, Karen was battling for her own life during November 2011 for the second one that cleared $400,000.  I so much wanted to make a token volunteer appearance,. but with the stormy weather, I could not afford to be sick, and thus be kept out of the ICU.  When Karen lost her own battle, I encouraged our friends to donate to ALSF along with several other non-profit organizations close to our hearts.

Having all of these chefs, mixologists, sommeliers, vintners, and craft brewers  in one place is an opportunity to sample their offerings and engage in short conversations during this four hour period.  In addition, one can spend an additional $75 to attend an after party at The Hungry Cat Hollywood from 5 pm to 8 pm.  For those that follow my occasional blog posts on ExperienceLA, you would know that I am a major fan of the restaurants owned by Suzanne, David, and Caroline, and have covered The Hungry Cat annual Crabfest. I have had many conversations with David about his growing up in Maryland, and the long time love affair of Maryland and Blue Crabs.  My long time fascination of the Chesapeake Bay in recent years has been replaced by the Gulf Coast, and the trend setting cooking coming out of Louisiana.  For myself, having just gotten back from my 13th visit to Louisiana, and checking out the Cochon outpost in Lafayette, I am again looking forward to talking to chef/owner Donald Link who was so personable back in 2010. Below is my mobile picture of Chef Link with New Orleans Chef Susan Spicer from 2010 taken with my mobile phone:

Susan spicer and Donald link in culver city supporting alex's lemonade stand

Last year appearing for the first time was Shelley Lindgren, sommelier/owner of A16 and SPQR in San Francisco, and author of two cooking/wine books. It was a visit to A16 during its initial six months of operation, that Shelley introduced me to southern Italian wines, especially those from Sicily. I remember being very intimated from the wine list, as my familiarity was with northern Italian wines. Shortly thereafter, Shelley was named the best sommelier under 30 by one of the leading wine publications. Recently I had an opportunity to catch up with Shelley Lindgren at an event at Book Passages in Corde Madera in which I had the following picture taken with her. DSC_5907

Shelley will be joined by her husband mixologist Greg Lindgren who works out of San Francisco's Rye on the Road.  And what would be a food event featuring the best mixologists without our own Eric Alperin from the Varnish (hidden inside Cedd Moses' Coles) in downtown Los Angeles.  Recently, at the international Tales of the Cocktail conference in New Orleans., Eric and Cedd were honored for the Varnish being the Best American Cocktail Bar. Also watch for mixologist Tim Staehling who manages all three Hungry Cat restaurants who earlier this year went with David Lentz to compete in the national Lobster Roll competition.

I am a major quail fan which I love to cook and seek out in restaurants.  Thus, I was in heaven over the last several weeks eating quail at various restaurants and festivals in Louisiana.  Back in 2010, Chef Michael Tusk of Quince in San Francisco was serving quail as shown below.  Chef Tusk will be back for 2012, but have no idea  whether he will cooking quail.  But I suspect one of thirty plus chefs will decide to play with quail, and I will be a fan.
Quince restaurant quail platingbr />
Finally, as we all should know by now, September 29th is Carmegeddon II, the weekend of the San Diego Freeway 10 mile shutdown from the Santa Monica to the Ventura Freeway. Thus, this would be a great event for all of those on the westside to stay local. Plus, for those with Metro access, the Culver Studios are only a few blocks away from the western terminus of the Expo line from downtown Los Angeles. An easy walk or very short bus ride.  So checkout the official ALSF web page for the event, and Like the L,A.Loves Alex's Lemonade on Facebook.

Silverlake Contemporary Ballet: The Swan Lake You've Always Wanted To See

To contact us Click HERE
SilverlakeBallet

Swan Lake.  A million ballerinas have danced a version of it, the hauntingly grand Tchaikovsky music is unmistakeable aaaaand who can forget 2010's The Black Swan? Seriously.  Well, that's all about to change.
The Silverlake Contemporary Ballet (SCB) is re-inventing the story once again and just to make it that much more LA, each act will be played by local legends...live...on stage. Yep, you heard that right.  Awesome sounds by Races, The Young Romans and Holly Conlan will each play a rock rendition of the centuries-old ballet score.  In addition, a collection of large scale paintings curated by Edgar Varela Fine Arts will set the scene, American Apparel will donate the costumes and, together, all tell their depiction of a love story 'tested by Hollywood morality'.


Just a taste of what you'll see:


The SCB returns after a sold-out 1st season THIS WEEKEND for only 3 days of shows: September 21st - 23rd.  Tickets start at $25 to view a private dress rehearsal Friday evening and can run you to $36 for priority seating to see the full production at The Assistance League Theater of Hollywood.  Can't afford the show? Join the volunteer crew and see the show for free! Contact HERE for details.
SilverlakeBallet
SilverlakeBallet
SilverlakeBallet

A much overdue addition to our burgeoning creative community, Swan Lake by the Silverlake Contemporary Ballet promises an amazing eruption of talent to see and is a show not to be missed.  See you soon!
Xo,Melissa 

Event Ideas: The Halloween Variety of Los Angeles

To contact us Click HERE
amigos muertos
amigos muertos by Karol Franks
from our Flickr Pool
There's that first Fall chill in the air and before we know it one of my favorite holidays will be upon us - Halloween! But the season is more than just costumes and sweets, it's the perfect reason to head out on a new Los Angeles experience. Here's some suggestions from our calendar that cover a wide range of what LA has to offer!


Head out to a museum!
Halloween Haunts and the Chamber of Horrors
The Hollywood Museum - Hollywood
Open until November 5th
$15 Adults; $12 for Seniors and Children under 12
Exhibition includes  basement filled with Hannibal Lecter's original jail sell; villains on display (Freddy Krueger, Michael Meyers, Jason Voorhees, and Chucky), and film and television props from classic horror to present-day.

Make a costume!
Halloween Swap-O-Rama-Rama
reDiscover Center - West LA
October 14th from 12:00pm-4:00pm
$5 donation with bag to swap ($10 w/o bag)
Bring unwanted clothes and a small donation to participate in the ultimate random Halloween costume creation.  Volunteer sewers and crafters will be on hand to help refashion your findings.  You leave with all the clothes you can carry.

See a show!
Twisted, Spooky, Creepy: Halloween Spirited One-Acts
Little Fish Theatre - San Pedro
Select Dates October 17th-26th
$20 Admission
Take in the spirit of Halloween with some hair-raising one-act plays.

Spend some time with the family!
Theatricum Boo-tanicum
The Will Geer Theatricum Botanicum - San Fernando Valley
October 26th from 2:00pm-10:00pm
$20 Adult; $5 Child (5-12); $15 Teen (13-18)
In this second annual event, families can enjoy food, costumes, pumpkin carving, scary storytelling, games, and a haunted house!

Fishy Fest
Heal the Bay's Santa Monica Pier Aquarium - Santa Monica
October 27th and October 28th from 12:30pm-5:00pm
$5 suggested donation ($3 minimum); Free for children 12 and under; Group Rates Available
Celebrate Halloween and Dia de los Muertos with costumes and crafts.  Activities include a "mad scientist" laboratory, marine animal graveyard, storytime, face painting, and crafts and masks.

Get some exercise in!
Zumba Halloween Glow Party 
Heartbeat House Dance Studio
October 27th from 7:00pm -9:00pm
$20 Advance Tickets; $25 Day-of
A 2-hour dance party with glow-in-the-dark accessories.

-Charity Tran


CARLO SCARPA'S BRION-VEGA CEMETERY

To contact us Click HERE

"I would like to explain the Tomba Brion...I consider this work, if you permit me, to be rather good and which will get better over time. I have tried to put some poetic imagination into it, though not in order to create poetic architecture but to make a certain kind of architecture that could emanate a sense of formal poetry....The place for the dead is a garden....I wanted to show some ways in which you could approach death in a social and civic way; and further what meaning there was in death, in the ephemerality of life—other than these shoe-boxes."— Carlo Scarpa. "Can Architecture Be Poetry." from Peter Nover, Ed. The Other City Carlo Scarpa: The Architect's Working Method as Shown by the Brion Cemetery in San Vito D'Avitole. p17-18.
MAXXII Exhibition photo

I found it impossible to find directions to this place online...Take the Regionale Train towards Bassona del Grappa (4.10 Euros each way)Stop: Castelfranco VenetoTake the Autolinea n4 Bus towards Cavaso del Tomba (3 Euros each wayStop: San Vito di Altivole




12 Ekim 2012 Cuma

Baldwin 51%, Thompson 47%.

To contact us Click HERE
A new Rasmussen poll on the Senate race in Wisconsin.

How did Tommy lose so much ground? Did Tammy's DNC speech elevate her? Was it all her negative ads? Is it Tommy not trying enough, thinking he could coast to victory?
Are people looking at pictures of the 2 of them and picking the prettier one?

Are Republicans kicking themselves for passing up the very pretty Eric Hovde?

"White House: Obama and Biden were never aware of requests for more Benghazi security."

To contact us Click HERE
Josh Rogin at Foreign Policy reports (after his earlier post "Biden contradicts State Department on Benghazi security," which I discussed at length earlier this morning). Rogin interviewed Deputy National Security Advisor for Communications Ben Rhodes, asking him "whether Biden was speaking for the entire Obama administration, including the State Department." What Biden said was: "We weren't told they wanted more security. We did not know they wanted more security there."
Rhodes said that Biden speaks only for himself and the president and neither of them knew about the requests at the time.

The State Department security officials who testified before House Oversight Committee Chairman Darrell Issa's panel Wednesday never said they had made their requests to the president, Rhodes pointed out. That would be natural because the State Department is responsible for diplomatic security, not the White House, he said. Rhodes also pointed out that the officials were requesting more security in Tripoli, not Benghazi.
So here's the harmonization that is supposed to save Biden from the charge of lying. When Biden said there would be an investigation into the security lapses and Raddatz (the moderator) interjected "And they wanted more security there," Biden said:
Well, we weren’t told they wanted more security there. We did not know they wanted more security again. And by the way, at the time we were told exactly — we said exactly what the intelligence community told us that they knew. That was the assessment. And as the intelligence community changed their view, we made it clear they changed their view.
That's not a lie because Biden was only talking about himself and President Obama. "We" means just Obama and Biden, per Rhodes. But then what do we make of the line "we were told exactly — we said exactly what the intelligence community told us that they knew"? And "That was the assessment"? If Biden knows now that wasn't the assessment and he and the President were not told what the intelligence community knew, he can't truthfully assert that "we were told exactly — we said exactly what the intelligence community told us that they knew"... unless you lay a whole lot of weight on the words I just boldfaced. That is, he was cleverly refraining from saying that the intelligence community told us what they knew. We heard what they told us they knew... and they were not telling the truth. They knew other things, but they didn't tell us. But what they told us, they told us they knew.

NOTE: There's another out: the scope of the term "intelligence community."

AND: Another out stresses the word "there" in Biden's "Well, we weren’t told they wanted more security there." As Rhodes points out: the requests were for more security in Tripoli and the attack occured in Benghazi.

IN THE COMMENTS: Shouting Thomas said:
Uh... yeah... But, how does that explain the prompt production of the "offensive" video as the reason for the attacks?
Here's my theory. It was 9/11, the last 9/11 before the election, and Obama wanted to do something 9/11-y. His people dug up this offensive video on YouTube for Obama to talk about in some eloquent mishmash that would somehow make him sound like a leader who has made a wonderful connection to the Muslim world. Then the al Qaeda attack occurred in Libya, taking over the 9/11 spotlight, interfering with Obama's planned message, and even tainting his legend as The Man Who Shot Bin Laden. A decision was made to absorb the Libya attack into the planned 9/11 story. It was a bad decision, but they doubled down on it anyway. The election was so close, and the truth could be sorted out later.

"FLASH: TV RATINGS FOR VP DEBATE DOWN SHARPLY... DEVELOPING... "

To contact us Click HERE
Says Drudge, in all caps, which... isn't that yelling? I'm tired of all this yelling!
CBS 10.4 MILLION
ABC 6.9 MILLION
NBC 6.8 MILLION
FOX 5.3 MILLION

*CABLE NUMBERS LATER TODAY...
**69.9 MILLION WATCHED IN 2008...
As I said, I'm tired of the yelling. I found the debate really hard to watch, but I kept watching because I was committed to live-blogging. Even still, I got catatonic. There was a point when I didn't write anything for 20 minutes and then I said:
Biden has been yelling at Martha Raddatz for the last 15 minutes (as the subject is war). It's so inappropriate!
The previous post had been:
The stress level is rising. Biden is so angry. Why is he yelling? Ryan needs nerves of steel not to lose his cool. I'm impressed that Ryan, when he gets his turn, is able to speak in an even, natural voice. It's hard to concentrate on the policy itself, because the emotional static is so strong.
That shows how I felt: pain. So here's my question. Ratings were down, I see, but when were the ratings taken? In the beginning? How did the ratings drop off over the course of the 90 minutes? Who was still around when Biden was yelling at Martha Raddatz for 15 minutes? How did the gender balance change over the course of the evening? I'll bet people — especially women — left in droves and the ratings were overall much worse than those already-low numbers say. And for the people that instinctively — with good human sense — clicked away, what was lodged in their mind was revulsion toward Biden. That's what happened to me. But then I stuck around, enduring the (second hand) brow-beating and bullying.

You know, I have an aversion to politics. If you've been reading this blog for a while, you might remember the old subtitle "Politics and the aversion to politics...." That was absolutely sincere. I am one of the many people — sensible people, many of them women! — who naturally withdraw from the political debate. It's just not worth it. Life is short, and much of it is beautiful and full of love. I want to go somewhere else. But somewhere else for me has been writing — ironically, about politics. That's an odd thing about me, but it puts me in a position where I can see some things that typical political junkies don't see. And I think I speak — in some way — for the people who would not watch that debate, certainly not much more than 20 minutes of it, with Biden's childish, clownish rudeness.

Democrats like cartoons, Republicans like reality shows.

To contact us Click HERE
According to TiVo-based research.
Over all, the Democratic list contained a lot of animated comedies — “The Cleveland Show,” “Family Guy,” “American Dad” — as well as lightly viewed but critically acclaimed sitcoms like “30 Rock” and “Community.”

The Republican list, beyond sports (Nascar was [in addition to golf, big), was populated with a host of reality shows — “The Biggest Loser,” “Survivor,” “American Idol” and “The Amazing Race."...

Why did Paul Ryan drink so much water?

To contact us Click HERE
People are asking. Did you not notice that he frequently sipped water? I never noticed Biden drinking water, and at the first debate, I never noticed Romney or Obama drinking water.

What's the best explanation?
  
pollcode.com free polls 

11 Ekim 2012 Perşembe

I'm paraphrased by Rush Limbaugh.

To contact us Click HERE
On the show today:
A lot of people in the media and some left-wing bloggers are starting to scratch their heads about the inability of Obama and other members of the campaign and the regime to stop talking about how badly he did in the debate.  "Okay, you had a bad night. Forget it; move on.  Why keep talking about it?  Why keep reminding people how badly Obama did?"  Ann Althouse in Michigan has an interesting theory about this, and I'll paraphrase her.
Paraphrasing me all the way to Michigan.
She said, essentially, that the reason the campaign will not let go of how poorly Obama did is that they want everybody to think that's what happened.  It wasn't that Romney was good; it wasn't that Romney was anything special. The reason that debate happened the way it did is because Obama had an off night. Obama was the shock and surprise. Obama was off his game. Obama was pathetic. Obama was pitiful.

You keep repeating it over and over and over again because you don't want people to realize how great Romney was.  That's her theory, and I like it.  It's unique. It's great thinking.
Here's the post, de-paraphrased. I got Rush Limbaugh's "great thinking" stamp of approval, which might get me in trouble out here in the vicinity of Lake Michigan.

My post was also linked in James Taranto's Best of the Web today. He says:
Saying that Obama had a stinkeroo of a night is a way of avoiding the possibility that Romney is simply the better candidate.

If the remaining debates make the latter conclusion inescapable, watch lefties shift their focus to what a stinkeroo of a politician Obama turned out to be (now they tell us!). This, too, would entail a degree of wishful thinking. If Obama is undone, it will be not only because his political skills are lacking, but also because his record is poor.

And his record is poor because his ideas are bad. But as Matt Bai observes in the forthcoming issue of the New York Times magazine: "Political partisans will go to extraordinary lengths to blame the messenger rather than question the orthodoxies of their message."
Here's the Matt Bai piece, which I haven't read yet but will.

Even if Obama thought first — or even only — about reelection, how could he have chosen to lie the way he did about Libya?

To contact us Click HERE
Mark Steyn writes:
The State Department has now conceded that there was no movie protest at all. and that it was, in fact, one of the most sophisticated military attacks ever launched at a diplomatic facilityBoth these very obvious points were surely known to Washington by 6 a.m. Eastern on Wednesday September 12, by which time the surviving consulate staff had been evacuated to Tripoli. Yet Ambassador Rice, President Obama, et al., were still blaming the video days later. Obama and Secretary Clinton always refer to Ambassador Stevens as “Chris” — Chris this, Chris that — as if he were a treasured friend or intimate. Yet they and the sad hollow men around them dishonor their “friend” in death.
Quite aside from the wrongness of lying, generally and specifically, in this case, and quite aside from the motivation to lie — I'm going to presume, without more, it was campaign politics — why did Obama think he could get away with this lie long enough, and why was he not daunted by the risk entailed in going on and on, doubling down on the lie, and even lying in a U.N. speech? How did he have the nerve to co-opt our U.N. ambassador, Susan Rice, and subvert her credibility and honor? How did he get this millstone around the neck of Hillary Clinton, who has such a strong interest in her independent career and who knows a thing or two about the devastation of getting caught lying? (And this lie can't be waved away as as lie "about sex." It's a lie at the very heart of our trust in the President.)

Now, I have a few more questions, focusing on the choice to construct the lie out of that "Innocence of Muslims" video. Here's a montage of statements that were made about the video:
OBAMA:  I don't care how offensive this video was, it was terribly offensive and we should shun it.

HILLARY:  This video is disgusting and reprehensible.  It appears to have a deeply cynical purpose, to denigrate a great religion and to provoke rage.

CARNEY:  Let's be clear.  These protests were in reaction to a video that had spread to the region.

OBAMA:  You had a video that was released by somebody who lives here, sort of a shadowy character, an extremely offensive video.

CARNEY:  The unrest we've seen has been in reaction to a video.

OBAMA:  A crude and disgusting video sparked outrage throughout the Muslim world.

RICE:  It was a spontaneous, not a premeditated response, a direct result of a heinous and offensive video.

OBAMA:  I know there are some who ask, "Why don't we just ban such a video?"  The answer is enshrined in our laws.  Our Constitution protects the right to practice free speech.
Was this just the nearest lame excuse, like the dog ate my homework? The President must have known that the truth about the attack on the embassy would eventually emerge. He couldn't have assumed that those called to testify in congressional hearings would commit perjury. Even if everyone would be willing to commit perjury, how could they think they could credibly pull off lies about protests — vivid public events — that never took place? Maybe Obama's only concern was that the truth not emerge before the election, but given the risk that it would, why wasn't he afraid of how bizarre and outrageous the video story was?

The video story, moreover, put Obama in a position where he had to present caring for the feelings of violent foreigners as something that challenges our commitment to free speech, as if it were a difficult matter to brood over. He made it sound as though he would ban the video — or take the proposal to ban it seriously — if only the Constitution didn't stand in his way. Was he interested in making a show of respect for constitutional law? It didn't come off as too respectful, especially when they arrested the filmmaker (who was, conveniently, on parole and thus arrestable). This was the worst sort of scapegoating. Obama called this man — this erstwhile nonentity — "a shadowy character."

And this inane and unnecessary display of concern for the feelings of Muslims depended on thinking about Muslims as a bunch of idiots and criminals. It wasn't respectful at all to promote this caricature of Muslims as people who look at a stupid video and lose their minds, take to the streets, and work themselves up into a murderous rage. The video story could only work as a cover for the truth if it could be leveraged on an offensive stereotype of Muslims. It is the story about the response to the video — far more the video itself — that has "a deeply cynical purpose, to denigrate a great religion"! Why didn't Obama care that he was insulting Muslims in this weird charade about caring for Muslims?

Why was any of this worth doing, even cynically? Even if you assume Obama put his own reelection first, how could he possibly have selected this lie and thought it was a good idea? Yes, the planned terrorist attack in Libya hurts the image he would like to have as the vanquisher of al Qaeda, but the truth about that has already come out, with 3 weeks left to go before the election. By handling the matter the way he did, we have — on top of the damage to the vanquisher of al Qaeda image — a glaring lie and plain evidence of extremely poor judgment.

Biden "will surely take it to Ryan on... his statement yesterday that inner-city kids need to be taught 'good discipline' and 'character.'"

To contact us Click HERE
Writes John Cassidy, in The New Yorker, observing that tonight's VP debate is high stakes.

Cassidy doesn't link to the Ryan statement, which — I found on my own — is part of the video that made the rounds the other day, the one that supposedly showed Ryan being "testy." (We talked about it here.) Anyway, let me put the "good discipline" and "character" remark in context. Ryan was asked the question "Does the country have a gun problem?" Ryan took the position that the problem is crime, not guns, and that we already have enough "good, strong gun laws," which we ought to enforce better.
But the best thing to help prevent violent crime in the inner cities is to bring opportunity to the inner cities, is to help people get out of poverty in the inner cities, is to help teach people good discipline, good character. That is civil society, that's what charities and civic groups and churches do to help one another, make sure they realize the value in one another.
Let's try to understand why people like Cassidy think that's outrageous (as opposed to platitudinous).  Here's Tommy Christopher at Mediaite:

What you don’t often hear spoken (out loud, anyway) is that the real problem with gun violence in America is the “character” and “discipline” of people in the “inner cities,” a very specific delineation from other city folk...

Apparently, crime in our cities has nothing to do with poverty, and systemic failures, fueled by generations of institutionalized racism, but with the character of those people. So says Paul Ryan, and so says Mitt Romney. If you’re poor, it’s because your culture is inferior.

Ryan’s assessment of “inner city” people is of a piece with the not-at-all subtle (and even out-and-proud overt) attitudes of the leading lights in the Republican Party, best exemplified by racism decoder-ring Newt Gingrich, who helpfully singled out black people as the Food Stamp-satisfied people we already knew they were talking about, and who echoed Ryan’s chatter about the low character of the inner city denizens who “have no habits of working and have nobody around them who works. So they literally have no habit of showing up on Monday. They have no habit of staying all day. They have no habit of ‘I do this and you give me cash,’ unless it’s illegal.”

We already knew who the “those people” Romney and Ryan were talking about were, but thanks for the hint, all the same.
In this frame of mind, Ryan was talking down to black people — to use a phrase once aimed at Barack Obama himself. And let's take another look at Obama's 2007 speech to a predominately black audience:
We can’t expect them to have all the skills they need to work. They may need help with basic skills, how to shop, how to show up for work on time, how to wear the right clothes, how to act appropriately in an office. We have to help them get there.
Unlike Ryan, who looked to "civil society... what charities and civic groups and churches do to help one another," Obama thought there should be federal government programs to teach poor (black?) people to "act appropriately." The difference between conservatives and liberals is about how to solve what they are perceiving as a problem. Pointing out that there's a problem is a sensitive matter, so sensitive it might be better not to point it out at all, as Jesse Jackson's famous open-mike pushback showed.

Will Biden "surely take it to Ryan" on this issue? He might, but it's treacherous. Ryan should be prepared with something elegant to say, but I predict it won't come up because Biden's the one who's gaffe prone, and you don't want to make a gaffe about race.

CNN tried to extract a colorful quote about debate prep from Paul Ryan

To contact us Click HERE
Interviewed about his debate prep, Ryan said "I do a lot of reading, that's what I've always done -- briefings and reading," which CNN duly quotes. Then it's on to hunting. How does he prepare for deer hunting? The interviewer has background info from a friend of Ryan's:
The friend said that before Ryan goes hunting he washes his clothes in unscented detergent, takes a shower with unscented soap and sprays unscented material on his boots -- all steps that hunters are known to take generally, but Ryan takes it to a completely different level.

"If you're into archery and bow hunting, that's the way to do it and be successful. I like the strategy of bow hunting and it takes a lot of preparation and I do take it seriously because I am much more successful if I do things properly and prepare the right way," Ryan said.
"I have always just believed that if you're going to do something, do it well."
He's invited to connect this to debate prep (presumably with the hope that he'll say something more colorful than I read a lot):
"This stage is kind of new for me and I'm taking it very seriously," he replied. "I'm just doing my homework and studying the issues and I'll know he'll come and attack us. The problem he has is he has Barack Obama's record to run on."
I think he just mostly said I read a lot again. Nice try CNN. Maybe go interview a friend of Ryan's about Ryan's pre-Biden shower routine. Any relevant aromatherapy? Any "material" sprayed on his shoes? Unscented... scented... Maybe Ryan could stink it up and thereby trick his prey into screwing his face into a disgusted sneer of some kind. We the viewers have television — not the once-dreamed-of smellovision — so the ruse would go undetected. Suddenly, Biden's nice-guy image erodes.

Actually, some of us are still dreaming:



"In the future we will be picking our political leaders at least partially based on their smell," says Weird Al.

"So what you're saying is that what counts is race above all.... You want underprivileged of a certain race and privileged of a certain race. So that's race."

To contact us Click HERE
Said Justice Anthony Kennedy at during the oral argument over the the University of Texas affirmative action policy. UT, following state law, automatically admits everyone who graduates from a Texas high school in the top 10%, a colorblind policy that produces a certain amount of racial diversity, especially since there are many high schools in Texas that have a very high proportion of black or Hispanic students.

So why does UT do any additional affirmative action as it fills up the portion of the entering class not admitted through the 10% program? You've already got a lot of diversity, so why do you need more? The additional affirmative action is precisely to bring in privileged black and Hispanic students, that is, the black and Hispanic students who did not attend racially isolated schools. If white students get too many of the top 10% spots at those schools, then the 10% program does not bring enough of these minority students into UT.

The university says... that the highest-ranked students at a disadvantaged school have lower SAT scores than some in the middle of the pack at a more competitive suburban high school. UT's affirmative-action program aims to open doors for minority applicants from middle-class or professional families. Such students can "help dispel stereotypical assumptions…which actually may be reinforced" by minorities admitted only because of the top-10% plan, UT said in its brief.

Justice Samuel Alito seized on that point. "I thought that the whole purpose of affirmative action was to help students who come from underprivileged backgrounds, but you make a very different argument that I don't think I've ever seen before," he said.
Actually, under the Court's case law, the diversity that is considered a compelling interest (which is what the state needs to defend race discrimination) is not about boosting the underprivileged. In Grutter v. Bollinger, the majority approved of the idea of  assembling a class that includes "a 'critical mass' of minority students," which does not mean "racial balancing, which is patently unconstitutional" but is "defined by reference to the educational benefits that diversity is designed to produce."
These benefits are substantial. As the District Court emphasized, the Law School’s admissions policy promotes “cross-racial understanding,” helps to break down racial stereotypes, and “enables [students] to better understand persons of different races.”...These benefits are “important and laudable,” because “classroom discussion is livelier, more spirited, and simply more enlightening and interesting” when the students have “the greatest possible variety of backgrounds.” ...

The Law School does not premise its need for critical mass on “any belief that minority students always (or even consistently) express some characteristic minority viewpoint on any issue.”... To the contrary, diminishing the force of such stereotypes is both a crucial part of the Law School’s mission, and one that it cannot accomplish with only token numbers of minority students. Just as growing up in a particular region or having particular professional experiences is likely to affect an individual’s views, so too is one’s own, unique experience of being a racial minority in a society, like our own, in which race unfortunately still matters.
If it's about breaking down stereotypes, the 10% approach creates a problem: The minority students in the classroom tend to come from the racially isolated schools, the less privileged Texans. So, it seems, the additional affirmative action is needed to get a more varied group of minority students, in which case, the point is to bring in privileged minority students, because these are the students who — in Grutter terms — might provide the classroom benefit of teaching all the students that minority students don't have "some characteristic minority viewpoint."

Obviously, there were dissenting opinions in Grutter. For example, Justice Scalia scoffed at that idea of the compelling interest: The lesson taught by classroom diversity is "essentially the same lesson taught to (or rather learned by, for it cannot be 'taught' in the usual sense) people three feet shorter and twenty years younger than the full-grown adults at the University of Michigan Law School, in institutions ranging from Boy Scout troops to public-school kindergartens."

I'm not taking a position on whether UT's admissions policy is good or whether it's constitutional. (Do not assume you know what I think. You don't.) All I am saying is that if Grutter is to be applied (and not limited or overruled), an affirmative action program that's all about boosting the most privileged minority students actually makes sense.

Did Justice Alito not see that (or was he mainly expressing disapproval)? Here's his quote (along with Justice Kennedy's), put in context, beginning at page 43 of the PDF transcript:
JUSTICE ALITO: Well, I thought that the whole purpose of affirmative action was to help students who come from underprivileged backgrounds, but you make a very different argument that I don't think I've ever seen before. The top 10 percent plan admits lots of African Americans -- lots of Hispanics and a fair number of African Americans. But you say, well, it's -- it's faulty, because it doesn't admit enough African Americans and Hispanics who come from privileged backgrounds. And you specifically have the example of the child of successful professionals in Dallas. Now, that's your argument? If you have -­ you have an applicant whose parents are -- let's say they're -- one of them is a partner in your law firm in Texas, another one is a part -- is another corporate lawyer. They have income that puts them in the top 1 percent of earners in the country, and they have -­ parents both have graduate degrees. They deserve a leg-up against, let's say, an Asian or a white applicant whose parents are absolutely average in terms of education and income?

[GREGORY G. GARRE, counsel for the University of Texas]: No, Your Honor. And let me -­ let me answer the question. First of all, the example comes almost word for word from the Harvard plan that this Court approved in Grutter and that Justice Powell held out in Bakke.

JUSTICE ALITO: Well, how that question be no, because being an African American or being a Hispanic is a plus factor.

MR. GARRE: Because, Your Honor, our point is, is that we want minorities from different backgrounds. We go out of our way to recruit minorities from disadvantaged backgrounds.

JUSTICE KENNEDY: So what you're saying is that what counts is race above all.

MR. GARRE: No, Your Honor, what counts is different experiences -­

JUSTICE KENNEDY: Well, that's the necessary -- that's the necessary response to Justice Alito's question.

MR. GARRE: Well, Your Honor, what we want is different experiences that are going to -- that are going to come on campus -­

JUSTICE KENNEDY: You want underprivileged of a certain race and privileged of a certain race. So that's race.

MR. GARRE: No, Your Honors, it's -- it's not race. It's just the opposite. I mean, in the LUAC decision, for example, this Court said that failing to take into account differences among members of the same race does a disservice -­

JUSTICE KENNEDY: But the reason you're reaching for the privileged is so that members of that race who are privileged can be representative, and that's race. I just -­

MR. GARRE: It's -- it's members racial group, Your Honor, bringing different experiences. And to say that -- if you took group, if you had an admissions process that to admit from a -- people from a particular background or perspective, you would want people from different perspectives.

CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS: Counsel -­

MR. GARRE: And that's -- that's the interests that we're discussing here. It's the interests that the Harvard plan specifically adopts and lays out -­

10 Ekim 2012 Çarşamba

CARLO SCARPA'S BRION-VEGA CEMETERY

To contact us Click HERE

"I would like to explain the Tomba Brion...I consider this work, if you permit me, to be rather good and which will get better over time. I have tried to put some poetic imagination into it, though not in order to create poetic architecture but to make a certain kind of architecture that could emanate a sense of formal poetry....The place for the dead is a garden....I wanted to show some ways in which you could approach death in a social and civic way; and further what meaning there was in death, in the ephemerality of life—other than these shoe-boxes."— Carlo Scarpa. "Can Architecture Be Poetry." from Peter Nover, Ed. The Other City Carlo Scarpa: The Architect's Working Method as Shown by the Brion Cemetery in San Vito D'Avitole. p17-18.
MAXXII Exhibition photo

I found it impossible to find directions to this place online...Take the Regionale Train towards Bassona del Grappa (4.10 Euros each way)Stop: Castelfranco VenetoTake the Autolinea n4 Bus towards Cavaso del Tomba (3 Euros each wayStop: San Vito di Altivole




Welcome to Jake's Architecture World

To contact us Click HERE

Welcome to Jake's Architecture World
"First we shape our buildings, then they shape us." –Winston Churchill
I have been extremely passionate about architecture my whole life and I thought it would make sense to create Jake's Architecture World so I could share all my ideas and notes on architecture with the world. I intend to showcase many, many different types of architecture, with an emphasis on innovative design. In particular, I am fascinated with intimate spaces that incorporate the best technology, but typically keep it invisible.
I figured I would begin with a photo of one of my favorite pieces of architecture that was designed by Lloyd Wright, who was Frank Lloyd Wrights son. This beauty is located in Los Angeles, and I intend to go into much more depth on this masterpiece.

...The Greatest Piece Of Residential Architecture... Virginia Tech's LUMENHAUS

To contact us Click HERE

...The Greatest Piece Of Residential Architecture...
Virginia Tech's LUMENHAUS
My single favorite piece of residential architecture is named LUMENHAUS and it was conceived and built by Virginia Tech's School of Architecture. It's inspiration was the "glass pavillion-style Fransworth House designed by Bauhaus architect, Mies Van Der Rohe."
I could create and maintain a blog, just on the amazing design of the LUMENHAUS, so on Jake's Architecture World, I plan to write a series of detailed stories on this magnificent piece of residential architecture.
LUMENHAUS is the 3rd solar-house designed and built by Virginia Tech, as part of a research and development program which began in 2002. The LUMENHAUS is being a perfect blend of innovative architecture design and technology.


The Ultimate Marin Infinity Pool- Belvedere's Shimmering Bay View...

To contact us Click HERE

The Ultimate Marin Infinity PoolBelvedere's Shimmering Bay View
I grew up in San Francisco, and Marin County so over the years, I have become quite familiar with some of the most beautiful homes in the San Francisco Bay Area. Belvedere is Italian, and translated into English it means "beautiful view."
This Belvedere beauty has one of the coolest Infinity pool I have ever seen in my life!!! It is called "At The Waters Edge" and it is located on the western-slope of Belvedere Island which has a view of "Sausalito's Sparkling Bay."

I have been in this house and it is one of the coolest modern homes I have ever seen. it was designed by the New York based architect, Charles Gwathmey. In the future I plan to write much more extensively about it and show many more photos of its architecture.


I have never been much of a fan of the Plasma TV over the fireplace, but I must admit this one is really, really nice!!!


Joseph Simmons Run's House Indoor Basketball Court

To contact us Click HERE

Joseph SimmonsRun's House Indoor Basketball Court ManCave
I love shooting hoops. I am not that crazy about playing basketball, but I find just hanging-out with a friend or by myself, while shooting hoops to be extremely therapeutic and it is a good way to maintain your flexibility and balance.
Joseph Simmons, best know as "Run" was one of the founding members of Run DMC. He has his own reality TV show named "Run's House" and in the following set of photos, we see him chillin' on his indoor basket ball court, which I believe is right of the kitchen.

I think it is fascinating how well thought-out the space-saving design of Run's indoor basketball court is. If you look closely, the hoop and backboard are attached to the wall so help save room. I would love to have a setup like this, but I would want the ability to lower the hoop so I could slam dunk the ball.

Joseph Simmons is now a practicing minister known as Reverend Run, and he is the younger brother of Russell Simmons, the co-founder of Def Jam Records.

9 Ekim 2012 Salı

Obama 48%, Romney 48% in the daily tracking poll, but Romney pulls ahead in the swing state poll.

To contact us Click HERE
The regular Rasmussen tracking poll is the same as yesterday's, but the report includes a teaser for new swing state poll with comes out in about half an hour:
Today’s results will show Romney slightly ahead in the 11 key swing states. This is a significant change. 
Obama was 2 points ahead yesterday, so Romney has gained at least 3 points in one day.

UPDATE: Here's the new swing state poll. Romney is now up 2, after being down 2, so it's a 4 point gain in one day.
The states collectively hold 146 Electoral College votes and include Colorado, Florida, Iowa, Michigan, Nevada, New Hampshire, North Carolina, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Virginia and Wisconsin.

Obama makes an O.J. Simpson joke and he can't get the name of the SUV right.

To contact us Click HERE
"Elmo has been seen in a white Suburban!"

He turned the Ford into a Chevy. Maybe that was intentional, since he saved General Motors and not Ford.

Or did he pick Suburban because he hates suburbia? Stanley Kurtz has written a whole book on that subject, which he summarizes here. Excerpt:
The centerpiece of the Obama administration’s anti-suburban plans is a little-known and seemingly modest program called the Sustainable Communities Initiative. The “regional planning grants” funded under this initiative — many of them in battleground states like Florida, Virginia, and Ohio — are set to recommend redistributive policies, as well as transportation and development plans, designed to undercut America’s suburbs. Few have noticed this because the program’s goals are muffled in the impenetrable jargon of “sustainability,” while its recommendations are to be unveiled only in a possible second Obama term.
But jokes about "Sesame Street" characters are so much more fun to play around with right now... la la la... as we run up to the election.
Obama’s former community-organizing mentors and colleagues want the administration to condition future federal aid on state adherence to the recommendations served up by these anti-suburban planning commissions. That would quickly turn an apparently modest set of regional-planning grants into a lever for sweeping social change.
Big Bird... tee hee... Elmo... ha ha... woman with a slashed throat... blood everywhere....

PPP poll for Daily Kos/SEIU: Romney 49%, Obama 47%.

To contact us Click HERE
Kos says:
That's a pretty disastrous six-point net swing in just a week, and the first time we've ever had Romney in the lead. It is inline [sic] with all other national polling showing Romney making gains in the wake of his debate performance last week....

Among women, Obama went from a 15-point lead to a slimmer 51-45 edge. Meanwhile, Romney went from winning independents 44-41 to winning them 48-42. And just like the Ipsos poll showed last week, Romney further consolidated his base. They went from supporting him 85-13 last week, to 87-11 this week while Obama lost some Democrats, going from 88-9 last week, to 87-11 this week....

... Obama's debate performance was an epic blunder. Romney gave his partisans a reason to get excited about him and they've responded. It should come as no surprise that people like to fight for people who are fighting for them.
That last sentence hints of anger that might be paraphrased as: We gave you a billion dollars and you didn't even bother to engage for 90 minutes.

What's one billion divided by 90? Obama threw away his supporters' money at the rate of over $11 million a minute. (And he wants to be in charge of spending all our money and much, much more for the next 4 years. Do the math!)

"Barack Obama in his old community organizer role," doing "what community organizers do... rub people's emotions raw to hype their resentments."

To contact us Click HERE
Thomas Sowell writes the pithiest thing that I've seen about the speech Obama gave on June 5, 2007. Remember, Obama told the predominantly black audience that the federal government — motivated by racial prejudice — would not waive the Stafford Act requirement that a city chip in 10% of the amount it would receive in federal disaster aid.
[L]ess than two weeks earlier, on May 24, 2007, the United States Senate had in fact voted 80-14 to waive the Stafford Act requirement for New Orleans, as it had waived that requirement for New York and Florida. More federal money was spent rebuilding New Orleans than was spent in New York after 9/11 and in Florida after hurricane Andrew, combined.

Truth is not a job requirement for a community organizer. Nor can Barack Obama claim that he wasn't present the day of that Senate vote, as he claimed he wasn't there when Jeremiah Wright unleashed his obscene attacks on America from the pulpit of the church that Obama attended for 20 years.

Unlike Jeremiah Wright's church, the U.S. Senate keeps a record of who was there on a given day. The Congressional Record for May 24, 2007 shows Senator Barack Obama present that day and voting on the bill that waived the Stafford Act requirement. Moreover, he was one of just 14 Senators who voted against -- repeat, AGAINST -- the legislation which included the waiver.

"Taliban says it shot ‘infidel’ Pakistani teen for advocating girls’ rights."

To contact us Click HERE
"The Pakistani Taliban claimed responsibility for the attack on ninth-grader Malala Yousafzai, who officials said was shot in the head by at least one gunman who approached a school bus in Mingora...."
“Two bearded armed men stopped our school van and asked for Malala and opened fire from behind the van,” the girl, named Shazia, said from the hospital where she and Yousafzai were first taken.

Ihsanullah Ihsan, chief spokesman for the Pakistani Taliban, said in calls to the media that the militant group targeted Yousafzai because she generated “negative propaganda” about Muslims.

“She considers President Obama as her ideal. Malala is the symbol of the infidels and obscenity,” Ihsan said.
The concern about "negative propaganda" is too disgusting to be funny.

Note: Yousafzai is not dead, at least not according to this report.

8 Ekim 2012 Pazartesi

Adventures at Comic-Con: Part 2 - Unlikely Advenures

To contact us Click HERE
The beauty of spending extra days at Comic-Con this year was being able to feel free to spend time on unexpected adventures. I did not know at the start of my trip that I would be:
  • figure drawing at bar;
  • cosplaying, and  
  • learning about Mass Effect and its voice actor fan base
While much of the focus of San Diego Comic-Con is on the events and panels in the San Diego Convention Center there are many events and activities going on outside the Convention Center's walls. 


Figure Drawing at Proper/Wine Steals
One such event was Trickster, an alternate venue for indie artists, housed this year at Proper/Wine Steals. I found myself there for an evening of figure drawing at a bar.  Most of time when you're out for a night on the town - especially in San Diego's Gaslamp District - you're probably not drawing or sketching.  But this was Comic-Con weekend and artists of all types were out and about.  So it was great just doodling away with all these talented artists while still enjoying the perks of a bar experience.  The models were compelling - often dressed in elaborate costumes and some interesting poses - giving much to contemplate on.

I spent some time as Wonder Woman and
got to meet Muppets!
The next day I thought I'd partake in a convention activity that I never participated in before - cosplaying.  My Halloween costume last year was Wonder Woman and I brought the costume with me on a whim.  In my years as a convention attendee, I had never cosplayed before (last year I wore a pink wig), but seeing everyone else in the spirit of things, I thought - why not?  Here I am with some of my favorite Muppets...I fit right in!  

Left to Right: "Mass Effect" Voice Actors
Raphael Sbarge, Kimberly D. Moore, and Courtenay Taylor
As Wonder Woman I headed out to the Mass Effect voice actor panel, across the street from the Convention Center.  There I met Raphael Sbarge, Kimberly D. Moore, and Courtenay Taylor - voice actors for Mass Effect who had a long line of fans that went out the door and wrapped around the building and down the street.  I'm not a gamer, but I don't think you need to be to understand how popular these actors are and what they mean to fans of the game.  Each of these actors took the time to take pictures with fans, sign autographs, and I think every single person that went through that line left with a grin on their face.  Sbarge also plays Archie/Jiminy on ABC's Once Upon A Time.  I overheard a number of fans state that they loved the show, but that they only started watching the show because of him!

One of the best things about conventions like Comic-Con is that it provides fans the opportunities to meet their favorite actors, writers, and artists.  But it also gives people the ability to learn new things and have new experiences - and I was glad to have not only my own new adventures, but see fans having moments that I know they'll remember forever.

Stay tuned!  My third - and last - recap of Comic-Con 2012 will feature my favorite TV show Buffy the Vampire Slayer.  
 
-Charity Tran

Adventures at Comic-Con: Part 3 - A Buffy Grand Finale

To contact us Click HERE
Nicholas Brendon signing autographs at Comic-Con 2012.
My last day at Comic-Con unintentionally celebrated my favorite show Buffy the Vampire Slayer (Confession: I am listening to the movie soundtrack as I write this).  I stopped by a booth where actors Nicholas Brendon (Xander Harris, Buffy the Vampire Slayer) and J. August Richards (Charles Gunn, Angel) were taking pictures and signing autographs.  Also at the booth was Eddie McClintock who plays Peter Lattimer on Warehouse 13 - also one of my favorite shows!

This was followed by a great panel on Buffy Turns 20, which encompassed the Buffy Universe from its start as a cult favorite movie starring Kristy Swanson and Luke Perry to its fame as a television series and its comic book continuity at Darkhorse.  The panel was moderated by Clare Kramer (Glory) and featured Dark Horse Editor Scott Allie, writer/producer Jane Espenson, illustrator Georges Jentry, and actors Nicholas Brendon, James Marsters (Spike), and Randall Batinkoff (Swanson's movie boyfriend Jeffrey Kramer).  It also opened with a Buffy Turns 20 tribute video. 

Buffy Turns 20 Tribute Video

The audience heard a number of interesting stories from the panel including how the series shifted into comic book format and favorite lines from the panel.  Espenson's favorite line is Willow's "You do doodle too" while Marsters met a cheering crowd with saying very slowly "Out for a walk..."

There was much discussion on the enduring nature of the Buffy universe and how integral it is to the rising prominence of strong female characters today.  When asked about why the show has continued to be popular, Jane Espenson perhaps stated it best: "Because high school is still hell."  The crowd also had the added treat of seeing Nicholas Brendon do the Snoopy dance, which was his responsne to favorite plot point or moment.

Following the panel was the Buffy Musical Sing-A-Long where I met up again with Nerdlush Hostess Elizabeth Ann.   The musical opened up with some musical medley remarks from Nicholas Brendon.

We were also given "Grr Argh" Mutant Enemy-esque finger puppets for the show which set the perfect mood to join in with a room full of people given plenty to sing about.

It was the perfect closing to a great Comic-Con 2012.

-Charity Tran

Grr.  Argh.

The Art of Fashion in Television: FIDM's Annual Gala

To contact us Click HERE
FIDMCostumeGala
Downton Abbey
Saturday, July 28th Emmy-nominated designers from such primetime hits as American Horror Story, Downton Abbey and Boardwalk Empire came together to celebrate and talk costumes at the 6th Annual Outstanding Art in Television Costume Design gala.
The night kicked off with a preview of the costumes at the FIDM Museum & Galleries in DTLA.  Having never been to the FIDM Museum, I was more than excited to find a substantial array of amazing designs with no plexiglass in between. Love this night already.  


Here are a few of my favorite displays...
FIDMCostumeGala
Magic City
FIDMCostumeGala
American Horror Story
FIDMCostumeGala
Pretty Little Liars

Venturing outside, we were met with the beautiful landscape of Grand Hope Park, not to mention a plethora of treats, drinks and mingle-worthy guests from the television and fashion industries.

FIDMCostumeGala
(top left) The awards stage, (top right) Super fashionable FIDM Gala staff member,
(bottom) Madison-To-Melrose blogger, Olivia & I enjoying the scenery.

Ruth Myers (Hemingway & Gellhorn), Eduardo Castro (Once Upon A Time) and Chrisi Karvonides (American Horror Story) were honored by Television Academy Chairman/CEO, Bruce Rosenblum for their outstanding craftsmanship.  They and FIDM Museum guest curator/costume designer, Mary Rose are pictured below.
FIDMCostumeGala

The Outstanding Art in Television Costume Design exhibit at the FIDM Museum is FREE & now open to the public until October 28, 2012.  Visit Tuesday-Saturday, 10am-5pm and be sure to see who wins it all at this year's Emmy Awards Sept. 23, 2012.  GO! It is more than worth the trip.

Xo,Melissa